I hate that Sarah Palin is being subjected to ridiculous remarks from the media and now from pop culture (MILF shirts, sexualized action figures, offensive commentary). I may consider her to be a ridiculously awful candidate for Vice President, but from what I can tell, the Conservative public’s embracing of Palin comes from the exact same place that rejected Hillary Clinton.
After all, a woman in power who could be perceived as shrewish or harsh was to be feared, ridiculed, and hated. A woman in power who can be perceived as a sexual and attractive is to be embraced — not because of any credentials (which, by the way?) but because she’s not a threat.
I believe that this all comes from the fear of women having power.
As for the idea that Sarah Palin is some feminist ideal, which is why you see pictures like this of Rosie the Riveter with Palin’s face.

But Sarah Palin as Rosie the Riveter? I know that Rosie didn’t originally represent what modern American feminism is all about right now (protecting women, ensuring that abortion stays legal, providing women with health care), but she has certainly become a symbol for more than just the strength of women. It’s not just about being able to do it, and you’re free to assign whatever “it” you want that to be.
Rosie the Riveter as a symbol is about what’s best for women, and I don’t believe that Sarah Palin is good for women.
Look at the more ridiculous elements of her past, like charging victims of rape for their rape kits or not having an opinion on the war in Iraq when her own son is in the military.
She supported Alaska’s failed 1998 amendment to define marriage as between a man and a woman, but worse than that, she doesn’t even support benefits for same-sex couples. She and McCain are miles behind Obama when it comes to health care, still supporting our completely abysmal health care system. (For a really good, personal look at what our current health care system is doing to American families, check out Heather Armstrong’s rant over at Dooce from last week.)
I also think it’s crazy that for all of these months, Conservatives have been saying not to trust Obama because of his lack of experience, and now they’ve chosen Palin — what a game we play in this country when it comes to our politics! I agree that Obama doesn’t have a ton of experience, which is perhaps why I voted for Hillary in the primary. BUT. . .if Obama’s lack of experience was enough to make me question his readiness to be president (which I now think that he is), Sarah Palin should be sending up tons of red flags!
Finally, there is the issue that many Conservatives are so excited about: the fact that John McCain and Sarah Palin would work to overturn Roe v. Wade. I used to be ardently pro-life. I read books and was vocal about my opinion, until I started asking the question, “It might not be right, but can it be illegal?” The thing is, abortion is a difficult issue. Women don’t have abortions because it’s fun, or because it’s their preferred form of birth control — even though you’ll hear Christians often saying that that’s exactly what they do. Women have abortions because life is not black an white.
The slander against women who have abortions is appalling. This abortion “facts” site tries to appear objective, but how objective is it to claim that “93% of all abortions occur for social reasons (i.e. the child is unwanted or inconvenient).” The number might be right, but how do you think that makes those 93% feel when they see that. Did they view their pregnancy as an “inconvenience,” or something much greater and more complex? I seriously doubt that they checked off a box at the clinic where they went and said, “Yep, I’m here ’cause I want my life to be easier.”
I didn’t start questioning my stance on abortion because I changed my mind about the value of human life. I started questioning it because I realized that there are times when I can’t be the judge of whether or not a woman should end a pregnancy. Evidently Palin hasn’t even given that thought, as she wouldn’t have let her daughter have an abortion even if the daughter was raped. Isn’t it interesting that her daughter wasn’t even given a voice in that decision? (PS — I don’t care about the “Bristol is pregnant” scandal, because it’s not a scandal, and it’s irrelevant.)
What is scandalous is the wholehearted embracing of Sarah Palin by so many women, who are excited about the prospect of a woman as Vice President, but only when she votes against them.
If nothing else, consider watching this video (embedding has been turned off), in which demonstrators at an abortion clinic were asked, “What punishment should face women who have abortions, should abortions become illegal?” The people in the video are not made fun of, and they are not ridiculed. It’s something that should make us think, and I wonder what Sarah Palin’s answer would be.